Madison: When I grow up, I want to be a gangster
19 Jul
First published in Madison, August 2010. Copyright Sarah Ayoub 2010
A spate of vicious crimes committed by children has rung alarm bells about Australia’s increasingly violent media. But, asks SARAH AYOUB, who’s really to blame?
In the playground of a south-western Sydney primary school, five year six boys huddle together defiantly as they watch the rest of the school go about its everyday business. To the rest of the school, they’re a gang not to be messed with, commanding respect and fear from the classroom to the school yard with their tough demeanour and aggressive attitudes. Their teacher Jessica, 24, is used to their behaviour, but even she looks on in horror as another boy walks past and mouths something at them. Seconds later the leader of the gang raises his arm, pistol in hand, and shoots the young boy in the temple.
The pistol, of course, is fake. Another prop in playground fun between bored children on the cusp of adolescence, playing out the scenarios they’ve seen in countless films and television series where crime and violence are seen as the tickets out of poverty. The reaction of their teacher, however, was very real - a reflection of growing adult concern over the influence of violent entertainment on impressionable young Australian minds.
When Underbelly 3: The Golden Mile made its debut to 2.2 million viewers on Australian TV earlier this year, it not only reignited the debate into representations of on-screen violence and its effects on children but it also brought another argument into the mix – the glorification of crime as an enterprise. The Underbelly franchise, which first aired in February 2008, has been one of Channel Nine’s great success stories, documenting the lives of some of Australia’s most notorious gangland criminals. Yet whilst fear and violence are at the core of the first two series’ narratives, giving a very real and murky snapshot of Australian’s criminal underworld, The Golden Mile – which follows the life of Sydney criminal identity John Ibrahim – casts a more glamorous glow on its protagonist and his cohorts, showing the wealth, women and immense privilege that comes with such notoriety.
What’s more, the show had spilled over into real life, with those on whom the characters were supposedly based paraded across the Australian media. The Daily Telegraph couldn’t get enough of the 39 year old Ibrahim, whose rise from disadvantaged western Sydney teenager to wealthy nightclub entrepreneur provide the bulk of The Golden Mile’s storyline. His multiple homes, nightclub ventures, and decadent spending habits (including a live-in hairdresser and round-the-clock bodyguard) have provided as much media intrigue as his business interests.
Such portrayals have dismayed parents, law enforcers and interest groups. The NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione and current Chair of the NSW Law Reform Commission James Wood both expressed concerns that television crime dramas, video games and Hollywood movies were glamorising crime to impressionable young people who might not be able to discern the reel from reality.
The debate over the effects on children of violence and crime in mass entertainment is nothing new. However, with changing social dynamics - like parents working more and longer hours, less time spent as a family and greater access to negative influences through newer technologies and the ability to socialise with whomever, whenever - they are becoming increasingly relevant.
According to Dr Wayne Warburton, Lecturer from the Department of Psychology and Deputy Director of the Children and Families Research Centre at Macquarie University, our brain adapt according to the concepts and emotional experiences that it is exposed to.
“Exposure to violent media changes the way our brain is wired”, he explains. “Research shows some well documented changes [including] an increased disposition towards aggressive behaviour and long term increases in fear, in the tendency to interpret others’ behaviours as hostile and in beliefs that aggression is a normal response to conflict”.
This is evident in the attitudes of George a 12 year old boy from one of Sydney’s inner west suburbs who admits that for him and his friends, fighting is often the most trusted method of problem-solving. “Movies and shows with lots of fighting and violence definitely make you more eager to fight”, he says. “It’s good to know how to [fight] because ‘gronks’ and people on the street get into punch ups because they think that they are gangsters like the people on TV”.
While George concedes that his friends’ attitudes most likely came about because of the media they consume ( he cites martial arts film Kickboxer as one of his favourites) he was also adamant that it was a generational issue. Interestingly, experts say that children and adolescents growing up in the late 90’s and early noughties have indeed been a lot more desensitised to violence than their older counterparts. But is TV really to blame?
According to Neilsen media research, by the time the average US child starts elementary school, he or she will have seen 8,000 murders and 100,000 acts of violence on TV. Such statistics seem plausible, especially considering the number of high profile ‘child’ murders we have seen over the last quarter of a decade. Few could forget the chilling murder of British toddler, Jamie Bulger in 1993 abducted and killed by two ten year old boys thought to have been inspired by the low grade horror film Chucky. Or even the death of six year old Tiffany Eunick in Florida who died in 2001 at the hands of her 13 year old neighbour after he performed wrestling moves on her inspired by those he had seen on television. Her death prompted the US’ most senior public health official at the time, US Surgeon General David Satcher, to release a report linking “exposure to media violence” with increased physical and verbal aggression in children, and ten years later, cases such as Tiffany’s seem to be heading closer to home.
In February 2010, the Brisbane Times reported that Liberal National Party police spokesman Vaughan Johnson demanded tougher vetting of television programming following the stabbing death of 12-year-old Elliott Fletcher at a Brisbane private school; the second private school killing in Brisbane in a fortnight. At the time, Queensland University of Technology Media Lecturer Susan Hetherington spoke about the virtual world that children see becoming so real, to the extent that it rarely differed to the real world.
“The sheer weight of [media violence] desensitizes us”, she told madison. “When you see something over and over, it not longer seems shocking or horrifying. That process of normalising [violence] is problematic”.
Indeed, violence and crime, whether real of portrayed, seems to have become a normal part of our existence. Interestingly, a decade or so ago, real-crime shows like Australia’s Most Wanted focused on bringing criminals to justice, whereas the latest spate of crime documentaries like Gangs of Oz, Beyond the Darklands and Australian Families of Crime seem to bring infamy, something that’s more likely to appeal to our increasingly extroverted You –Tube worshipping youth.
“Just because we can tell something is fictional, it doesn’t mean it cannot affect our thinking and behaviour “, says Warburton, warning that such portrayals are of particular concern to young children and teenagers who are still developing their sense of self.
This is especially relevant to mothers like Brisbane-based Melinda, 30, who works with Collective Shout [an organisation whose aim is to expose companies who sexualise children and objectify women], and faces such issues of violence and objectification, particularly of women, in her daily work. However, even she was surprised to find that her 14 year old son knew everything about Melbourne gangland killer Carl Williams, having looked him up on the internet in the wake of his murder.
“He [spoke] of how Williams was really powerful, and how he could walk into any room and command the respect of everyone there, and how he would love to have that kind of power”, she says.“I had to have a long talk to him about how much harm this man did to others and how awful it must be to live in fear of your life”.
Earlier this year, a classmate of Penny’s*, 15, brought a knife to school, threatening to use it to kill another student, with whom she’d had ongoing issues. The girl in question was a big fan of the The Combination, a 2009 Australian film which focused on the relationships between Lebanese Australian and Anglo Australians youths , and which had to be temporarily pulled from cinemas after two violent incidents during the film’s first week of release.
“We were all just hanging out on recess one day, and she was in a fight with three other girls”, Penny remembers. “Then she pulled a pocket knife out of her bag and lunged at the girl, screaming, ‘I’m gonna shank you! I’m gonna shank you’. There was a big group when the fight was happening, but as soon as they saw the knife, they all ran away and some called the police. The teachers were oblivious to what was going on until the cops came to investigate. She ended up getting expelled and we never heard anything about it again”.
Such stories are a concern for parents, who send their kids to school trusting in the fact that they will be safe havens. However, as statistics and case studies show, this is not always the case.
Dr Lance Emerson, CEO of the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, a national non-profit organisation that works to create better futures for Australia’s children and young people, told madison that youth violence is definitely on the increase, citing that the number of young people under 17 who were charged with assault had risen by about 48% since 1997, with the largest increase in violence in that period among young girls aged 10-19.
Despite such statistics, Dr Marc Brennan, Lecturer in Media and Communications at the University of Sydney is keen to point out shows like Underbelly are high productions that use elements of genre to attract viewers, not glamorise violence.
“Criminal behaviour and violence are narratives that translate well”, Brennan says. “When we blame the media we tend to ignore more difficult questions such as the socio-economic problems that often plague young offenders”.
Such socio-economic problems include levels of education, family income and types of employment, location and environmental factors. For those most likely to be affected, the combination of their family life and their local environment might mean they are constantly bored, unaware of resources available to them, or at risk of joining fellow youth of similar backgrounds and in the same location in anti-social behaviour.
As Charlie, 25, a high-school teacher says, “On many occasions, I hear [students] discuss that they’d like to be exactly like those Underbelly characters”, he says. “For most of them, though, it’s cultural, and they don’t really see a way out of it.”
So who is really to blame? Is it too simplistic an argument to suggest that TV alone contributes to the increase in youth aggression? Dr Brennan thinks so, pointing out that the majority of studies conducted on the links between increased aggression and media consumption are done by psychologists, not media researchers, who look for connections rather than investigating why the violence occurs.
“They [studies] suggest that violence didn’t exist before media”, he points out. “We blame the technology as a way of not addressing the bigger questions such as why children seem to think certain behaviours are [acceptable]. Maybe it is [not the media] but our values as a society that we [really] need to revisit.”





Sacred, traditional and beautiful, the transition from child to woman is a beautiful journey for every female, no matter her cultural and religious background. Four girls tell us how they celebrated their biggest milestone yet…







